Development Strategy for Future India and Atmanirbhar Bharat: A Way Forward

Keywords: development strategy, Atmanirbhar Bharat, inclusive development, developed nation, India

Abstract

This article examines the issues and development strategies for transforming the Indian economy into a developed nation by 2047, to which it aspires. We observe that the protectionist development strategy followed in the first four decades of independence could not bring the country out of poverty and only protected vested interests. In the last three decades, the economy did reasonably well in terms of economic growth as a result of the adoption of the strategy of economic liberalization. The pitfalls of liberalization were realized in terms of increasing inequalities and external dependencies, and stagnancy in manufacturing capacity. COVID-19 exposed the limitations of global supply chains. To lessen the shortcomings of the liberalization, the Government of India introduced the Atmanirbhar Bharat Package. It is expected that the Package will make the economy competitive and facilitate in achieving the objective of an inclusive developed nation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Surender Kumar, University of Delhi

Senior Professor, Department of Economics, Delhi School of Economics

References

Amirapu, A., and Subramanian, A., 2015. Manufacturing or Services? An Indian Illustration of a Development Dilemma. Available at: https://www.cgdev.org/sites/default/files/CGD-Working-Paper-409-Amirapu-Subramanian-Manufacturing-Services-India.pdf (accessed 30 March 2024).

Banga, R., and Goldar, B., 2007. Contribution of Services to Output Growth and Productivity in Indian Manufacturing, Economic and Political Weekly [e-journal] 42(26). Available at: Economic and Political Weekly website, https://www.epw.in/journal/2007/26/special-articles/contribution-services-output-growth-and-productivity-indian (accessed 30 March 2024).

Bhagwati, J. N., 1984. Splintering and Disembodiment of Services and Developing Nations. The World Economy, [e-journal] 7(2), pp.133-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.1984.tb00265.x

Bhalla, S., Bhasin, K., and Virmani, A., 2022. Pandemic, Poverty, and Inequality: Evidence from India. IMF Working Paper no.2022/069. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2022/04/05/Pandemic-Poverty-and-Inequality-Evidence-from-India-516155 (accessed 30 March 2024).

Chakrabarty, J., and Nagaraj, R., 2020. Has India deindustrialized prematurely, after three decades of free-market reforms? A Disaggregated Analysis. Economic and Political Weekly, [e-journal] LV(48), pp.40-47. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348480621_Has_India_Deindustrialised_Prematurely_A_Disaggregated_Analysis (accessed 30 March 2024).

Chand, R., and Suri, Y., 2024. Multidimensional Poverty in India since 2005-06. Available at: https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2024-01/MPI-22_NITI-Aayog20254.pdf (accessed 30 March 2024).

Chengappa, R., 2024. Redefining Bharat. [online]. Available at: https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/20240108-newsmaker-of-the-year-pm-narendra-modi-redefining-bharat-2482036-2023-12-30 (Accessed 30 March 2024).

Das, D. K., 2016. Trade Policy and Manufacturing Performance: Exploring the Level of Trade Openness in India’s Organized Manufacturing in the Period 1990-2010. Working Papers id:9073, eSocialSciences. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id9073.html (accessed 31 March 2024).

Datt, G., Ravallion, M., and Murugai, R., 2016. Growth, Urbanization and Poverty Reduction in India. Policy Research Working Paper 7568, World Bank. DOI:10.1596/1813-9450-7568

Denison, E. F., 1967. Why Growth Rates Differ., Washington, DC: Brookings.

Dev, S. M. 2021. Beyond India @75: Growth, Inclusion and Sustainability. Working Paper no. WP-2021-026, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research. [Accessed 01 April 2024].

Goldar, B., Krishna, K. L., Aggarwal S.C., Das D.K., Erumban A.A., and Das P.C., 2016. Productivity growth in India since the 1980s: the KLEMS approach. Indian Economic Review, 52(1/2), pp.37-71.

Goldar, B., Banga, R., and Banga, K., 2018. India’s Linkages into Global Value Chains: The Role of Imported Services. In Shah, S., Bosworth, B., and Muralidharan, K., (eds.), India Policy Forum 2017-18, 14(1), pp.107-172.

Goldberg, P. K., and Reed, T., 2023. Presidential Address: Demand‐Side Constraints in Development. The Role of Market Size, Trade, and (In) Equality. Econometrica, 91(6), pp.1915-1950. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA20787

Greenwald, B., and Stiglitz, J.E., 2014. Industrial Policies, the Creation of a Learning Society, and Economic Development, in Stiglitz, J.E., and Lin, J., eds., The Industrial Policy Revolution. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Jorgenson, D.W., and Timmer, M.P., 2011. Structural change in advanced nations: A new set of stylized facts, Scandinavian Economic Journal 113(1), pp.1-29.

Kumar, S., 2022. Economic growth prospect for India: A Sectoral Analysis. Manuscript.

Lal, D., 1988, 1989. The Hindu Equilibrium, Vols. I and II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lewis, W.A., 1954. Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School, 22(2), pp.139-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1954.tb00021.x

Maddison, A., 1987, Growth and slowdown in advanced capitalist economies: techniques of quantitative assessment. Journal of Economic Literature, 25 (2), pp.649-698.

Ministry of Finance, 2024. Highlight of Budget 2024-25, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi.

Oda, M., and R. Strapp, 2003. On the price of non-traded goods. Indian Economic Review, 38(1), pp.115-123.

Panagariya, A., with More, V., 2023. Poverty and Inequality Before and after Covid, paper presented at Columbia Summit on Indian Economy, New York.

Ravi, S., 2023. Making India Self-Reliant. EAC-PM Working Paper Series EAC-PM/WP/19/2023, Economic Advisory Council, Prime Minister, Government of India, New Delhi. Available at: https://eacpm.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/19-Atmanirbhar-India.pdf

Ravn, M. O., and Uhlig, H., 2002. On Adjusting the Hodrick-Prescott Filter for the Frequency of Observations. The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, 84(2), pp.371-75.

Ray, A. S., 2016. The enigma of the “Indian model” of development, Rethinking Development Strategies after the Financial Crisis, 2. New York: United Nations.

Rodrik, D., and Stiglitz, J.E., 2024. A New Growth Strategy for Developing Nations. [pdf] Available at: https://drodrik.scholar.harvard.edu/sites/scholar.harvard.edu/files/dani-rodrik/files/a_new_growth_strategy_for_developing_nations.pdf

Ros, J., and Skott, P., 1998. Dynamic effects of trade liberalization and currency overvaluation under conditions of increasing returns, The Manchester School, 66(4), pp.466-89.

Sell, F. L., 1988. “True exposure": The Analytics of Trade Liberalization in a General Equilibrium Framework. Kiel Working Papers 312, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), 124(4), pp. 635-652.

Subramanian, S., 2019. What is Happening to Rural Welfare, Poverty, and Inequality in India [online]. Available at: https://www.theindiaforum.in/article/what-happened-rural-welfare-poverty-and-inequality-india-between-2011-12-and-2017-18 (accessed 02 April 2024).

Published
2024-03-09
How to Cite
Kumar, Surender. 2024. “Development Strategy for Future India and Atmanirbhar Bharat: A Way Forward”. Contemporary World Economy 1 (4). https://doi.org/10.17323/2949-5776-2023-1-4-72-90.
Section
Country View