International Migration Cycle and its Effect on Remittance Flows
Abstract
At present, according to the World Bank, the number of migrants (i.e. persons who live in a country other than their country of birth) is about 295 million people or 3.7% of the world population. At the same time, over the past 50 years, the number of migrants has more than tripled. The expansion of migration processes, as a rule, leads to an increase in the volume of cash transfers, both those sent by migrants to their families’ homeland (to the migrants’ donor country) and those received by the migrants themselves in the recipient country. This study examines the patterns of migration processes between the two countries (the migrants’ donor country and the recipient country) and found the three stages of migration cycle. The findings show that remittances depend nonlinearly on the stage of migration. During the first stage, when migrants decide to migrate and start to leave the donor country for the recipient country, the volume of remittances sent by migrants to their homeland increases, as does the volume of transfers in the opposite direction. During the second stage, when the recipient country becomes a key destination and the migrant diaspora expands significantly, the transfers sent by migrants increase, yet the received transfers decrease or stagnate. During the third stage, when a high degree of migrants’ naturalization is high, the volume of remittances sent to the homeland decreases (due to the relocation of migrant families), while the received ones, on the contrary, start growing amid the sale of assets in their homeland. Using data from the World Bank, the UN, and central (national) banks, this study determines the quantitative conditions for the transition from one stage to another based on the concentration of migration flows from the donor country and the share of migrants from a specific donor country to the total number of migrants living in the recipient country. Additional findings show that in some cases, when migrants do not intend to live permanently in the recipient country, the volumes of the sent transfers continue to grow, even at very high concentrations of migration flows.
Downloads
References
Alper, A. M., Neyapti, B., 2006. Determinants of workers’ remittances: Turkish evidence from high-frequency data. Eastern European Economics. 2006. Vol. 44. No. 5. P. 91-100.
Amuedo-Dorantes, C., Pozo, S., 2006. Migration, remittances, and male and female employment patterns. American Economic Review. Vol. 96. No. 2. P. 222-226.
Analiticheskiy tsentr [Analytical centre]. Na pul’se: Obnovlennyy prognoz MVF. V fokuse: Mezhdunarodnyye denezhnyye transferty migrantov [On the pulse: Updated IMF forecast. In Focus: International remittances from migrants]. Byulleten’ o tekushchikh tendentsiyakh mirovoy ekonomiki. 2016. No 8. P. 1–19
Beine, M., Docquier, F., Özden, Ç., 2011. Diasporas. Journal of Development Economics. Vol. 95. No. 1. P. 30-41.
Bernard, A., Bell, M., Charles-Edwards, E., 2014. Improved measures for the cross-national comparison of age profiles of internal migration. Population Studies. Vol. 68. No. 2. P. 179-195.
Bernardo, A. B. I., Clemente, J. A. R., Wang, T. Y., 2018. Working for a better future: Social mobility beliefs and expectations of Filipino migrant workers in Macau. Australian Journal of Psychology. Vol. 70. No. 4. P. 350-360.
Bhugra, D., Becker, M. A., 2005. Migration, cultural bereavement and cultural identity. World psychiatry. Vol. 4. No. 1. P. 18.
Bondarenko, K. A., 2020. Vliyaniye transformatsii sotsiokul’turnykh faktorov na protsessy vneshney trudovoy migratsii Uzbekistana [The influence of the transformation of sociocultural factors on the processes of external labor migration in Uzbekistan]. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika. Vol. 16. No 3. P. 76–108.
Bondarenko, K. A., Kharitonova, N. A., 2023. Blagosostoyaniye immigrantov v Germanii: Stranovyye razlichiya i konvergentsiya dokhodov [The welfare of immigrants in Germany: Country differences and income convergence]. Sovremennaya Yevropa. Vol. 23. No 2. P. 186-201
Brown, R. P. C., 1997. Estimating remittance functions for Pacific Island migrants. World Development. Vol. 25. No. 4. P. 613-626.
Buch, C. M., Kuckulenz, A., Le Manchec, M. H., 2002. Worker remittances and capital flows. Kiel working paper. No. 1130.
Carrasco, L. N., 2010. Transnational family life among Peruvian migrants in Chile: Multiple commitments and the role of social remittances. Journal of Comparative Family Studies. Vol. 41. No. 2. P. 187-204.
Chami, R., Fullenkamp, C., Jahjah, S., 2005. Are immigrant remittance flows a source of capital for development?. IMF Staff papers. Vol. 52. No. 1. P. 55-81.
Chepel’, S. V., Bondarenko, K. A., 2015. Yavlyayetsya li vneshnyaya trudovaya migratsiya faktorom ekonomicheskogo rosta. Ekonometricheskiy analiz i vyvody dlya stran SNG [Is external labor migration a factor of economic growth. Econometric analysis and conclusions for the CIS countries]. Zhurnal novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii. 2015. Vol. 4. No 28. P. 142.
De Jong, G. F., 2000. Expectations, gender, and norms in migration decision-making. Population Studies. Vol. 54. No. 3. P. 307-319.
Díaz-Briquets, S., Pérez-López, J., 1997. Refugee remittances: Conceptual issues and the Cuban and Nicaraguan experiences. International Migration Review. Vol. 31. No. 2. P. 411-437.
Grigoryev, L., Kondrat’yev, S., Salikhov, M., 2008. Trudnyy vykhod iz transformatsionnogo krizisa [Difficult way out of the transformation crisis]. Voprosy ekonomiki. Vol. 10. P. 77–95.
Holst, E., Schrooten, M, 2006. Migration and money: What determines remittances? Evidence from Germany. DIW Discussion Papers, 2006. No. 566.
King, R., Dalipaj, M., Mai, N., 2006. Gendering migration and remittances: Evidence from London and northern Albania. Population, Space and Place. Vol. 12. No. 6. P. 409-434.
Kock, U., Sun, Y., 2011. Remittances in Pakistan–Why have they gone up, and why aren’t they coming down?
Lueth, E., Ruiz-Arranz, M., 2007. A gravity model of workers’ remittances.
Makhlouf, F., Kasmaoui, K., 2017. The impact of oil price on remittances: the case of Morocco. J. Energy & Dev. Vol. 43. P. 293.
Massey, D. S., Basem, L. C., 1992. Determinants of savings, remittances, and spending patterns among US migrants in four Mexican communities. Sociological Inquiry. Vol. 62. No. 2. P. 185-207.
Mayer, T., Zignago, S., 2011. Notes on CEPII’s distances measures: The GeoDist database.
Morrow-Jones, H. A., 1988. The housing life-cycle and the transition from renting to owning a home in the United States: a multistate analysis. Environment and Planning A. Vol. 20. No. 9. P. 1165-1184.
Mosler Vidal, E., Laczko, F., 2022. Migration and the SDGs: Measuring Progress.
Mukomel’, V. et al., 2011. Integratsiya migrantov: vyzovy, politika, sotsial'nyye praktiki [Integration of migrants: challenges, policies, social practices]. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya. Vol. 20. No 1. P. 34–50.
Nivalainen, S., 2004. Determinants of family migration: short moves vs. long moves. Journal of Population Economics. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 157-175.
Pukhova, M. M., Doroshina, I. P., Khodzhayeva, I. G., 2013. Teoreticheskiye osnovy migratsii [Theoretical foundations of migration]. Transportnoye delo Rossii. No 6-2. P. 13–16.
Ratha, D., Shaw, W., 2006. South-South migration and remittances. World Bank working paper. Vol. 102. P. 334934-1110315015165.
Schiopu, I. C., Siegfried, N., 2006. Determinants of workers’ remittances: Evidence from the European neighbouring region.
Toth-Bos A., Wisse B., Farago K. Goal pursuit during the three stages of the migration process. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2019. Vol. 73. P. 25-42.
Wooldridge, J. M., 2015. Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Cengage learning.
World Bank. World Migration Report. Available at: https://worldmigrationreport.iom.int/wmr-2022-interactive/ (access date 25.01.2023).
Yehuda-Sternfeld, S. B., Mirsky, J., 2014. Return migration of Americans: Personal narratives and psychological perspectives. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. Vol. 42. P. 53-64.
Yoon, E., Lee, R. M., 2010. Importance of social connectedness as a moderator in Korean immigrants’ subjective well-being. Asian American Journal of Psychology. Vol. 1. No. 2. P. 93.
Zaslavskaya, T. I., Rybakovskiy, L. L., 1978. Protsessy migratsii i ikh regulirovaniye v sotsialisticheskom obshchestve [Migration processes and their regulation in socialist society]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya. No 1. P. 56–65.
Zhou, J., 2014. Persistence motivations of Chinese doctoral students in science, technology, engineering, and math. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. Vol. 7. No. 3. P. 177.
1.jpg)
